It wasn't pedestrian at all. It's just the C and A that'd need a tweak if this presentation was used. Probably run the bottom of the C into the A and the problem is solved...
:) It is a simple design for looping. The easiest way that I found. And yes, I thought it was a solution seemed to me an anagram for C + W. Certainly is not a design right for you because a good logo should not be interpreted or described by the author. Right. Kerning '0 'was also, apparently, a pedestrian choice. I try other.
Well, we're intrigued, but we're not sure what to make of this. What is the drawing of? Points for originality, but points of for obscurity. Is this the loop at the bottom of a safety pin?
The typeface is certainly respectable, but the C and A have a kerning/overlap issue that would need to be fixed.
I think a different approach is probably more promising, though an explanation of the inspiration of the logo would be appreciated.
Comments
26-Dec-08, 12:59am GMT
22-Dec-08, 6:52pm GMT
It wasn't pedestrian at all. It's just the C and A that'd need a tweak if this presentation was used. Probably run the bottom of the C into the A and the problem is solved...
22-Dec-08, 6:33pm GMT
22-Dec-08, 6:14pm GMT
Well, we're intrigued, but we're not sure what to make of this. What is the drawing of? Points for originality, but points of for obscurity. Is this the loop at the bottom of a safety pin?
The typeface is certainly respectable, but the C and A have a kerning/overlap issue that would need to be fixed.
I think a different approach is probably more promising, though an explanation of the inspiration of the logo would be appreciated.
22-Dec-08, 5:55pm GMT
Disclosure: I created everything in my entry and I didn't copy anyone else's concept. (?)
Hello.21-Dec-08, 11:53am GMT