To be honest… I do not see what you see. I like it :)
Just leave it as is.
I assume that there will also be a layer with the shadow right?
Also just to make sure I will be able to add remove this S layer and have the original M with the surrounding spheres with or without shadow right? I played enough with Adobe Illustrator to know how to do this at least.
Again, Thanks
Disclosure: I created everything in my entry and I didn't copy anyone else's concept. (?)
ok, it took a few, but here it is with the requested symmetry. My only concern is the center blue connector. it actually looks smaller than the other connectors, but it is measured to be the same width. If you have any ideas on how to fix this appearance without sacrificing symmetry, Id be glad to hear them. Actually, it may be the outer connectors on the S that appear fatter than the rest, but if I decrease the width closer to the spheres, it looses its smoothness. Again, Id be glad to hear ideas on fixing this and maintaining symmetry.
Comments
Just leave it as is.
I assume that there will also be a layer with the shadow right?
Also just to make sure I will be able to add remove this S layer and have the original M with the surrounding spheres with or without shadow right? I played enough with Adobe Illustrator to know how to do this at least.
Again, Thanks
9-Oct-08, 3:41am GMT
Disclosure: I created everything in my entry and I didn't copy anyone else's concept. (?)
ok, it took a few, but here it is with the requested symmetry. My only concern is the center blue connector. it actually looks smaller than the other connectors, but it is measured to be the same width. If you have any ideas on how to fix this appearance without sacrificing symmetry, Id be glad to hear them. Actually, it may be the outer connectors on the S that appear fatter than the rest, but if I decrease the width closer to the spheres, it looses its smoothness. Again, Id be glad to hear ideas on fixing this and maintaining symmetry.thanks,
chris.
8-Oct-08, 7:38pm GMT