!
rickcolosimo has picked winning logo designs

For $700 they received 183 design concepts from 55 designers!

  • Award 1
    ASD02 by mfourex
  • Award 2
    ADSWorld by neboisa

Over 25,500 small businesses - and some big ones - trust crowdSPRING with custom logo design, web design and writing services. 96% of them would recommend that you try us too.

Find out more
Dates

Starts:9-Apr-09 3:12 p.m. GMT

Ends:14-Apr-09 3:12 p.m. GMT

Awards

Award 1: $500, was awarded to mfourex

Award 2: $200, was awarded to neboisa

Formats

EPS,PSD,JPG

Contract

Preview: crowdSPRING Contract

Materials

There are no materials for this project.

Creative brief

The buyer added updates to the brief. Read them.

LET ME TELL YOU ABOUT US:

This project is to create the logo for ASDworld.com, which will be primarily a social network for ASD families and the professionals and businesses that serve these families. The company will serve as an umbrella site that includes not only the typical social network features but also high value-add features for families that will lead to increased participation by the networks of professionals and businesses that seek to serve all aspects of the asd family's life.

This site will be based in the US and will initially target only US residents. It will initially be in English but will quickly aim to include Spanish-speaking families.

If you need to read about autism, start with http://www.autismspeaks.org/. As an example of the kinds of people that we are targeting, consider that autism strikes families across all socio-economic groups with slightly higher incidence rates in NJ and CA.

HERE IS WHAT WE NEED:

We are looking for a logo to serve as a key integral piece, the foundation really, of the brand identity, from placement on the website to serving as the foundation for the site design & color scheme to use on business cards, site badges, and even lapel pins.

OUR TARGET AUDIENCE IS:

The primary audience, the real users for whom we are creating value and whose presence and contributions greatly enhance the value of the site, are families with autistic children (including children who are now grown into adults). The first-person asd community is clearly within that group. The secondary audience is comprised of (a) the broad cross-section of doctors, therapists, lawyers, advocates, and related professionals that serve asd families and (b) the mainstream businesses that either serve ASD families as a component of their market or would like to create/share market-specific offerings for this segment.

WE LIKE THESE DESIGNS:

The Autism Speaks puzzle piece is the most notable motif for autism-related organizations. Most designs use the jigsaw piece in some fashion, and typically a multicolor version is used. We like the idea of using a simpler/clearer design so that it maintains integrity at different sizes and can carry more of its intrinsic meaning across different media/formats/channels.

Here are two logos we've approved for different businesses: http://www.thoughtstorm.com & http://www.namahagi.com

We think the Namahagi woodcut-style logo is more like what we're looking for here than the TSC logo.

WE ABSOLUTELY MUST HAVE (or we don't want to see) THIS IN OUR DESIGN:

We would not approve of something that was too confusing with the Autism Speaks design. It is NOT necessary to use the jigsaw motif but a generic design that doesn't create some kind of connection to autism (even via a new metaphor) won't be the right answer (e.g., a logotype-only sort of treatment won't be the right response for this project).

We suspect that a generic logo like the one for WAAD (http://www.worldautismawarenessday.org/) is unlikely to carry enough intrinsic meaning, but we are absolutely willing to be convinced if you explain your thinking.

Brief updates

9-Apr-09 6:39 p.m. GMT
It is acceptable to have a graphic-only (i.e., no words) submission. It's possible that we'll make that a follow-on item or choose an entry that has those elements integrated. It's my intention to place more emphasis on the graphic component than the type components.

As noted in the comments to the first set of entries (Yay Abby!), the ".com" portion of the name is even less important and need not be included in an entry. I believe its presence alone will have no impact on the decision (unless it's part of an overall design that just works better).
9-Apr-09 9:28 p.m. GMT
The graphic portion could certainly tend toward the iconic, to support the goal of creating a stronger image at different sizes and across materials. That means that it should be able to hold its own if any words or letters are removed.
9-Apr-09 10:50 p.m. GMT
I will review & comment on all the recent submissions later tonight Eastern time (US). Here's a face to put on the project -- this is our family from last week: http://www.tinyurl.com/DylanCBS
10-Apr-09 6:17 p.m. GMT
My comments and questions are not necessarily intended to be "change the design and let's see," unless that's what I write. You should feel free to explain how your entry addresses an issue I raise rather than try to redesign to chase my comments. I'm mindful of the fact that I will likely only pick one entry and trying to be respectful of your time and talents by providing timely feedback and trying hard to explain myself rather than just saying "I don't like it" or giving no feedback at all. Hope that helps.

If I was sure I knew what the design was supposed to look like, I'd have made that the basis of the project. My real goal here is to allow for different perspectives that aren't tainted by any preconceptions I might have about how to communicate the message.
14-Apr-09 12:54 a.m. GMT
The quality of entries as the deadline looms has gone noticeably downhill, in terms of people who clearly haven't read the project brief or any of my comments or even looked at the higher-ranked entries. I'm trying hard to stay very close to realtime with comments to make it easier for all of you. It's becoming harder for me, which doesn't seem like the response I was looking for.